Follow-up from "Resolve "Add Object Memory""

The following discussions from !128 (merged) should be addressed:

@RainerKartmann started a discussion: (+2 comments)

Can we create separate ARON types for ObjectID and OrientedBoundingBox? It would be good when we can re-use them separately. There should be a way to include other ARON types.
@RainerKartmann started a discussion:

Same here (define it in another xml)
@RainerKartmann started a discussion: (+3 comments)

How does this work? Where is ObjectAttachmentInfo defined in ARON? o:
@RainerKartmann started a discussion: (+1 comment)

Yes it would be good if we have a definite, stron timestamp type in ARON. @fratty Don't we have something like that?
@RainerKartmann started a discussion:
1. This is duplicated?
2. We only need the object-local bounding box. The OOBB in robot and global frame are computed on-demand by armarx::objpose::ObjectPose.

Edited Apr 16, 2021 by Rainer Kartmann